WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Case Studies Essay -- World Trade

WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding Case StudiesThe World Trade boldness implemented the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) as a message for member countries to settle trade disputes in an orderly process. The process involves an alleged injured country (complainant) filing a request for consultations with the alleged injuring company (respondent). If the consultations do not result in a mutually acceptable outcome, the complainant may request a Panel to hear the case and provide recommendations in accordance with GATT other WTO agreements. If either party disputes the outcome, they may appeal to the Appellate Body (AB), which may uphold or overturn the panels decision. deference with the recommendations is not compulsory however if a country does not conform to recommendations, the other party may request and impose sanctions on the other party if they are granted (Trebilock, Howe, & Eliason, 2013). Following are summaries of three cases presented before the Dispute Set tlement Body.Japan Measures Affecting the Importation of ApplesOn March 1, 2002, the United States (US) filed a request for consultations with Japan concerning their Sanitary Phytosanitary (SPS) regulations. At issue was Japans policy of restricting importation of apples from the US to prevent against fire blight bacterium. Since 1994, Japan had mandatory triannual review article of US apple orchards for fire blight, and banned importation from any orchard showing sign of the blight within a 500-meter perimeter of the orchard. It further required the sanitization of harvested apples with chlorine. The US arguedJapans measures appear to be inconsistent with the obligations of Japan under Article XI of GATT 1994, Articles 2.2, 2.3, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5... ...pan - Measures affecting the importation of apples - Report of the panel. Retrieved from World Trade Organization https//docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-DP.aspx?language=E&CatalogueIdList=14714&CurrentCatalogueIdI ndex=0&FullTextSearch=Summary. (2010, February 24). Summary of the dispute to date. Retrieved from World Trade Organization http//www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds245_e.htmTrebilock, M., Howe, R., & Eliason, A. (2013). The Regulation of International Trade. New York, NY Routledge.WT/DS243/8. (2003, July 21). United States - Rules of Origin for Textiles and attire Products - Panel Report - Action by the Dispute Settlement Body. Retrieved from World Trade Organization https//docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S006.aspx?Query=(Symbol=%20wt/ds243/*)&Language=ENGLISH&Context=FomerScriptedSearch&languageUIChanged= admittedly