Supreme Court Decision Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Supreme Court Decision - Essay ExampleThe evidence culled through these textbook messages intercepted by the police, when considered, does establish beyond any motion that the impeach was indeed engaging in unreasonable activities, which jeopardized the lives of the innocent citizens. Thereby the initiation of the interception of the text messages of the accused by the police, considering the fact that the police was under an big pressure to act in time, to avoid any further loss of life of the innocent citizens, was no way unreasonable. This act of the police when seen in the large context seems totally reasonable. It does need to be mentioned that the trespass doctrine facilitated by Olmstead v. United States (1928) if applied to the situation under consideration, validate the interception of Does text messages by the police without invoking any violation of the Fourth Amendment Rights, as the police while doing so no way violated the essential dignity of the accused as a huma n and as a citizen.Besides, the two pronged test propounded in Katz v. United States (1967), when applied to the issue under consideration does suppress the appeal made by the accused. While exchanging the text messages associated with his illegal activities, the accused was no way exhibiting an expectation of privacy as he was well conscious(predicate) that he was exchanging these text messages with the intention to facilitate his unlawful activities, and thereby, through the exercise of commonsense, was well aware that such messages and communications would attract the well deserved oversight of the law and order machinery. Doe was well aware that he was relying for the exchange of these text messages on the services sold by the local cell recall carrier, and in the light of United States v. Miller (1975), Does rights were not infringed upon if the company as a third party, entrusted his text messages to the police, guided by the mental picture that it was its legal and const itutional duty to help the police. Besides,